Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction (PRAGUE-2 trial).
نویسندگان
چکیده
To the Editor We read with interest the results of the PRAGUE-2 trial 1 and its editorial. 2 Widimsky et al. compared the effects of transport for primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI) and immediate thrombolysis (TL) for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), in the ran-domized trial PRAGUE-2. 1 The authors concluded that long distance transport from a community hospital to a tertiary PCI centre in patients with AMI is safe. The strategy markedly reduces the mortality in patients presenting >3 h after symptoms onset. Some methodological issues may affect these conclusions. The primary outcome of the study was total death at 30 days. The analysis by intention to treat showed no significant reduction in death, 6.8% in PCI vs 10.0% in TL group (P=0.12). However the authors emphasize that per protocol analysis showed a significant reduction in death, 6.0% in PCI vs 10.4% in TL group (P<0.05). Per protocol analyses are prone to bias and are not recommended for reporting the primary outcome of the study. In addition they performed a post hoc subgroup analysis comparing patients randomized <3 h and >3 h after symptoms. To avoid bias adequate analysis of the subgroup effect should be performed with an interaction test that was not reported in the paper. This small study of 850 patients may be not large enough to detect a moderate but clinically important reduction of total death by primary PCI. Similarly, the DANAMI-2 was a single small country study that showed a non-significant death reduction of 6.6% in PCI vs 7.6% in TL group (P=0.35). 4 A formal meta-analysis published recently included 7739 AMI patients. 3 The rate of death was 7% in primary PCI vs 9% in TL group (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62–0.86 P<0.001). This contrasts to the informal meta-analysis by Zjistra in the editorial with data from 6478 patients. The rate of death was 5.5% in primary PCI vs 7.8% in TL group (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.57–0.85 P<0.001). Zjistra concluded that primary PCI for AMI patients should be applied widely in urban areas in Europe. Meta-analysis of small RCTs are prone to publication bias because trials with positive results are more likely to be published than those with inconclusive results. A funnel plot is a graph of plots of the trials' effect estimates against the sample size to assess the validity of meta-analysis. In the absence of publication bias the plot will …
منابع مشابه
A prominent coronary Thebesian system.
short-acting thrombolysis and immediate planned rescue angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: the PACT trial. PACT investigators. Plasminogen-activator Angioplasty Compatibility Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1954–1962. 30. Widimsky P, Groch L, Zelizko M, Aschermann M, Bednar F, Suryapranata H. Multicentre randomized trial comparing transport to primary angioplasty vs immediate thromboly...
متن کاملAngioplasty vs thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative overview of the effects of interhospital transportation.
Primary angioplasty has been shown to be superior to thrombolytic therapy for treatment of patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in randomized trials. However, even in countries where large numbers of percutaneous coronary interventions are performed, thrombolytic therapy is still used far more often, in daily practice. This is caused by issues such as logistical diffic...
متن کاملAcute Myocardial Infarction Beneficial Effects of Immediate Stenting After Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction
OBJECTIVES The Southwest German Interventional Study in Acute Myocardial Infarction (SIAM III) investigated potentially beneficial effects of immediate stenting after thrombolysis as opposed to a more conservative treatment regimen. BACKGROUND Treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) by thrombolysis is compromised by Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 3 flow rates of only 60% an...
متن کاملTransfer for primary angioplasty versus immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND The benefit of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) over thrombolysis has been clearly demonstrated in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, the best therapeutic strategy for a patient with AMI presenting to acute care services without catheterization facilities remains under debate. Our objective was to gather all available information from clinical trials comparin...
متن کاملOutcome after combined reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction, combining pre-hospital thrombolysis with immediate percutaneous coronary intervention and stent.
BACKGROUND Primary therapies in acute myocardial infarction (thrombolysis and angioplasty) have inherent limitations which may be overcome by combining them. So far, no trial has demonstrated a clinical benefit in combining mechanical and pharmacological treatment strategies. METHODS From January 1995 to December 1999, out of 1010 patients admitted to our institution for acute myocardial infa...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- European heart journal
دوره 24 19 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003